The Missing Apostle
Why Is Paul Never Mentioned in the Qur’an?
If the Qur’an Affirms the Gospel, Why Does It Ignore the Man Who Shaped Its Spread?
One of the most glaring absences in the Qur’an is any reference to the Apostle Paul—a man who shaped the theology, spread, and structure of early Christianity more than any other historical figure after Jesus. This silence is not a neutral omission. It is a fatal blind spot in the Qur’an’s claim to affirm the Gospel and to continue the prophetic story of divine revelation.
📜 Paul: A Central Historical Reality
Paul of Tarsus:
-
Authored at least 7–13 books of the New Testament.
-
Was responsible for spreading Christianity throughout Asia Minor, Greece, and Rome.
-
Defined key Christian doctrines: justification by faith, the role of grace, the divinity of Christ, and the New Covenant.
-
Was viewed by the early Church not as a side figure—but as the Apostle to the Gentiles, handpicked by Jesus Himself (Acts 9).
Without Paul, Christianity as a world religion would likely not exist. If Islam claims to be the successor of the Injil (Gospel), it must deal with Paul. Yet it doesn’t. Why?
🧩 The Qur’an's Silence: A Theological Problem
Despite claiming to affirm the Torah and the Gospel (Qur’an 3:3; 5:46–47), the Qur’an:
-
Never names Paul.
-
Never engages his theology.
-
Never critiques or affirms his influence.
This silence becomes catastrophic for the Qur’an’s credibility for three reasons:
1. ❗Contradiction with Qur'anic Claims of Gospel Continuity
The Qur’an says:
“We sent Jesus, son of Mary, confirming what came before him in the Torah, and We gave him the Gospel...”
— Q 5:46
It also commands Christians:
“Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein...”
— Q 5:47
But the Gospel available in the 7th century included Paul’s writings. His epistles were already circulated, copied, canonized, and taught.
So here’s the dilemma:
-
If Paul corrupted Jesus’ message, why doesn’t the Qur’an mention or warn about him?
-
If Paul was faithful to the Gospel, why does his theology contradict the Qur’an’s rejection of Jesus’ divinity, the Trinity, and salvation by grace?
The Qur’an can’t have it both ways.
2. ❗Undermines Allah’s Claim to Omniscience
If Allah is all-knowing and the Qur’an is His final revelation, how could He ignore Paul’s impact?
This isn’t a footnote in history. Paul was central to the formation of Christianity as Islam encountered it. Any divine book correcting Christians would logically mention the man most responsible for what they believe.
If Allah didn’t know about Paul, that undermines omniscience.
If Muhammad didn’t know about Paul, that undermines prophethood.
3. ❗The Convenient Silence Suggests Human Authorship
There’s a much simpler explanation for Paul’s absence: Muhammad didn’t know about him.
Muhammad’s exposure to Christianity came from fragmentary oral stories, not detailed theological or historical knowledge. In 7th-century Arabia, most Christians were Nestorian or Ebionite, and many Arabian Christians were not deeply familiar with Pauline theology.
So when the Qur’an critiques Christianity, it does so in vague, generic, and often inaccurate ways, never touching Paul’s writings or theology. This suggests:
-
The Qur’an was written from limited second-hand sources, not divine omniscience.
-
Its author lacked access to the core documents of Christian faith.
-
The result is a man-made caricature of Christianity, not an informed divine correction.
🧠 Why This Matters
Paul is unavoidable if you are genuinely affirming or correcting the Gospel. By failing to engage him, the Qur’an fails its own standards.
“Had it been from other than Allah, they would have found many contradictions in it.”
— Q 4:82
The Qur’an’s silence on Paul is itself a contradiction:
-
It claims to affirm the Gospel.
-
But ignores the man who wrote much of it.
-
And disagrees with its contents without addressing their author.
This isn’t revelation. It’s selective editing.
🔚 Conclusion: You Cannot Affirm the Gospel While Ignoring Paul
To ignore Paul is to erase the foundational history of the very Gospel the Qur’an claims to affirm. This isn’t a minor oversight. It’s a fatal contradiction that discredits the Qur’an’s historical reliability and theological consistency.
Paul’s absence in the Qur’an isn’t just a silence—it’s an indictment.
It exposes a book trying to rewrite history without understanding it.
No comments:
Post a Comment