Shariah Today
Obsolete or Oppressive?
Is Islamic Law Fit for the Modern World?
Shariah—Islamic law—is often portrayed by Muslim apologists as a perfect, divine legal system that offers justice, balance, and moral clarity for all of humanity. But when critically examined, especially in the light of today’s human rights norms and historical evidence, Shariah appears less like divine justice and more like a fossilized system rooted in 7th-century tribal Arabia.
❓ The question must be asked: Is Shariah a divine ideal—or a system that is both historically obsolete and morally oppressive by today’s standards?
📜 1. Historical Realities: Has Shariah Ever Worked?
Despite the claims of a just “golden age,” Islamic empires never uniformly implemented Shariah as a comprehensive, consistent legal system. Instead:
-
Local custom (urf) and sultanic law often overrode religious rulings.
-
The four Sunni madhhabs (legal schools) differ widely on major issues.
-
Judges could cherry-pick rulings across schools to justify decisions.
Even in Islam’s golden age, Shariah was fragmented, inconsistent, and subject to political manipulation.
A “divine” legal system shouldn’t require this much human patchwork.
🩸 2. Core Penalties: Morally Problematic Today
The hudud punishments prescribed by Shariah are alarming by modern ethical standards:
-
Amputation for theft
-
Stoning for adultery
-
Flogging for fornication and drinking
-
Death for apostasy and blasphemy
Many of these punishments are rooted in pre-Islamic tribal customs, not some transcendent moral code.
Can a system that cuts off hands and executes critics really be considered “merciful” or “universal”?
🚫 3. Suppression of Individual Rights
Shariah severely curtails:
-
Freedom of religion: Apostasy is punishable by death (per classical consensus).
-
Freedom of speech: Criticism of Islam or Muhammad is blasphemy.
-
Gender equality: Women are treated unequally in inheritance, testimony, marriage, and divorce.
-
Sexual autonomy: Victims of rape must produce four witnesses or risk punishment themselves.
Such constraints would be considered gross human rights violations in any modern liberal democracy.
💡 4. A System That Can’t Be Reformed?
Attempts to modernize Shariah face a paradox:
-
If Shariah is divine and eternal, reform implies rebellion against God.
-
If it can be reformed, then it is not eternal nor perfect—merely historical.
This explains the Islamic world’s intellectual paralysis:
-
Reformers are branded heretics or Western agents
-
Conservative scholars cling to medieval interpretations
-
Moderate Muslims avoid specifics and speak in vague abstractions
A truly divine system would transcend time. Shariah doesn’t. It’s trapped in the past.
🌍 5. Global Rejection
Most Muslim-majority nations do not fully implement Shariah—and for good reason:
-
Where Shariah is enforced (e.g., Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia), it leads to repression, violence, and international condemnation.
-
Countries like Turkey, Tunisia, and Malaysia maintain civil law systems precisely to avoid Shariah's legal limitations.
-
Muslims voting with their feet: many flee from Shariah-based regimes to secular liberal democracies.
The irony is profound: Muslims escape Shariah to seek freedom in the West, then claim Shariah is liberating.
❌ 6. The Myth of Moral Supremacy
Apologists often claim Shariah is morally superior. But how does it compare?
| Issue | Shariah | Modern Ethics |
|---|---|---|
| Apostasy | Death penalty | Freedom of belief |
| Women’s testimony | Half of a man's | Equal rights |
| Slavery | Regulated, not abolished | Condemned entirely |
| Child marriage | Permissible (no age limit) | Criminal offense |
| Corporal punishment | Required | Banned as inhumane |
Shariah fails by every modern ethical and legal benchmark.
🔍 Bottom Line:
Shariah is neither timeless nor universally moral. It is:
-
Historically inconsistent
-
Rooted in tribal customs
-
Incompatible with modern human rights
-
Dangerously rigid or selectively reinterpreted
-
Globally rejected in practice by the very communities who claim it as divine
Islamic Shariah is not the solution. It is the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment