The Myth of Biblical Corruption
Qur’anic Silence, Historical Fiction
Why the Qur’an Never Claims What Muslims Insist—and How History Exposes the Lie
One of the foundational beliefs in Islamic apologetics is that the Torah and Gospel have been corrupted. Muslims are taught that these scriptures were once genuine revelations but were later altered, distorted, or lost—leaving only the Qur’an as the final, preserved truth.
But here’s the scandal:
❗ The Qur’an itself never makes this claim.
And the historical record doesn’t support it either.
This post exposes the theological invention of biblical corruption—a belief never taught by the Qur’an, unsupported by historical evidence, and fabricated centuries later to shield Islam from contradiction and critique.
📜 1. The Qur’an Affirms the Torah and Gospel—Repeatedly and Without Exception
Let’s begin with the Qur’an’s own words.
“Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light.” — Q 5:44
“And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus… and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light, and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah.” — Q 5:46
“Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein.” — Q 5:47
These verses don’t merely refer to the Torah and Gospel—they praise them as containing divine light and guidance, and command Jews and Christians to judge by them.
Nowhere in the Qur’an do we find:
-
A clear, unambiguous declaration that the Torah or Gospel were textually corrupted
-
A statement that the books available in the 7th century were no longer valid
-
A description of when, how, or by whom the corruption took place
If the Qur’an truly intended to correct falsified scriptures, it would have had to say so.
It didn’t.
🤐 2. The Qur’an Is Silent Where Muslims Are Loud
The Islamic tradition developed loud accusations of Biblical corruption—yet the Qur’an is completely silent on:
-
Any historical event of corruption
-
Any person or group responsible
-
Any comparison between the “original” and “forged” versions
-
Any quotation of “false” scripture
Instead, it treats the Torah and Gospel as authoritative, present realities:
“Say: O People of the Book! You have nothing until you uphold the Torah, the Gospel, and what has been sent down to you from your Lord.” — Q 5:68
How could they “uphold” what supposedly no longer existed?
📚 3. Early Muslims Never Claimed the Bible Was Corrupted
Muslim polemicists only began asserting the corruption of the Torah and Gospel after centuries of debate with Jews and Christians.
Early Islamic commentators like:
-
al-Tabari (d. 923)
-
al-Razi (d. 1209)
-
al-Ghazali (d. 1111)
…often acknowledged the integrity of the Biblical texts, accusing Jews and Christians only of misinterpretation, selective reading, or concealment—not textual fabrication.
Even Muhammad himself, according to hadith, interacted with Torah scrolls, placing them on cushions and affirming their value (Abu Dawud 4449).
The actual doctrine of textual corruption (tahrif al-nass) arose later, as a defensive maneuver against mounting evidence that the Bible and Qur’an contradict each other.
🔍 4. The Historical Evidence Is Overwhelming—The Bible Was Not Corrupted
Let’s get specific:
-
We have thousands of Biblical manuscripts, in multiple languages, dating centuries before Muhammad.
-
Dead Sea Scrolls (150–50 BC) contain major portions of the Old Testament, virtually identical to today’s Hebrew Bible.
-
The New Testament is the best-attested text in ancient history, with over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, many from the 2nd–4th centuries AD.
-
The Qur’an never cites a lost or unknown Gospel—it only assumes the Gospel exists without identifying it.
So if Muhammad was referring to a “true” Gospel and Torah lost before his time, history would know—and it doesn’t.
There is no manuscript evidence, no early Christian testimony, no hint that a different Gospel ever existed and was universally replaced. This is historical fiction.
🧨 5. Islam’s Only Escape Route Destroys Itself
Let’s be clear: Muslims are caught in a dilemma.
-
If the Torah and Gospel were preserved (as the Qur’an states), then Islam contradicts divine revelation.
-
If the Torah and Gospel were corrupted (as later Muslims claim), then the Qur’an is wrong for affirming them.
❗ Either way, Islam self-destructs.
The myth of Biblical corruption was invented to escape this contradiction. But the Qur’an provides no theological escape hatch—and the historical record seals the door shut.
🔚 Conclusion: The Qur’an’s Silence Is Deafening
The Qur’an:
-
Repeatedly affirms the Torah and Gospel
-
Commands Jews and Christians to follow them
-
Offers no hint of textual loss or forgery
-
Points to existing texts in Muhammad’s time as valid
And yet Muslims today insist the Bible was corrupted—a belief with no Qur’anic support, no early Islamic consensus, and no historical basis.
The belief in Biblical corruption is not revealed truth.
It is revisionist theology, retrofitted centuries later to protect a crumbling system from collapse.
Islam cannot win this debate without contradicting its own scripture and denying the evidence of history.
No comments:
Post a Comment