Tough Questions for Muslims About Early Contradictions in the Qur’an

Confronting the Fault Lines in Islam’s Foundational Claims

---

🧠 Introduction: When Critical Thinking Meets Sacred Assumptions

For a faith that claims to be the final revelation from God, Islam’s foundational book—the Qur’an—should be free of contradiction, logical fallacy, and historical error. After all, the Qur’an itself declares:

“Do they not ponder the Qur’an? Had it been from anyone other than Allah, they would have found in it much contradiction.”
(Qur’an 4:82)

This verse sets the standard: zero contradictions.
But what happens when we apply that standard to the Qur’an itself?

This post lays out tough, unavoidable questions about contradictions—not invented by critics, but exposed by the Qur’an's own claims.

---

❓1. How Can the Qur’an Confirm Scriptures It Contradicts?

The Qur’an repeatedly claims to confirm previous scriptures:

• “It is He who sent down the Torah and the Gospel before... and the Qur’an as a criterion.” (Q 3:3–4)

• “Say: O People of the Book, you have no ground until you observe the Torah and the Gospel...” (Q 5:68)

But it also denies the very core doctrines of those scriptures:

Core Doctrine	Bible Says	Qur’an Says
Divinity of Christ	Affirmed	Denied (Q 5:72)
Crucifixion	Affirmed	Denied (Q 4:157)
Trinity	Affirmed in essence	Rejected (Q 5:73)
Salvation by Grace	Affirmed	Rejected (Q 23:102–103)

Question:

How can the Qur’an “confirm” the Torah and Gospel while denying their content?

Is this not a textbook contradiction?

---

❓2. Why Are the "Books of the People of the Book" Trusted Then Distrusted?

The Qur’an commands:

• “Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein.” (Q 5:47)

But Muslims are taught:

• The Gospel has been corrupted

• The Torah is unreliable

Question:

If the Torah and Gospel were already corrupted, why does the Qur’an tell Jews and Christians to follow them?

There are only three options:

1. The Torah and Gospel were authentic at the time of Muhammad → Qur’an affirms the same texts Christians had

2. They were already corrupt → Qur’an contradicts itself by affirming them

3. They were partially corrupt → Qur’an gives no guidance on which parts are true or false

In all three cases, the Qur’an either contradicts itself or fails to clarify.

---

❓3. If Muhammad Is in the Torah and Gospel, Why Has No One Ever Found Him There?

“... the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in the Torah and Gospel with them...” (Q 7:157)

Muslims argue this is a clear prophecy about Muhammad.

But where is he?

• Jews deny it—no mention of Muhammad in the Torah

• Christians deny it—no prophecy of an Arab prophet in the Gospels

• Muslim apologists stretch metaphors, e.g., Deuteronomy 18, Song of Songs, John 14 (Paraclete)

Question:

If the Qur’an claims Muhammad is “written in the Torah and Gospel,” and no one has ever found such a prophecy in the actual texts, isn’t this a falsifiable claim?

The Qur’an anchors its authority in texts that don’t support it.

---

❓4. How Can the Qur’an Claim Perfect Clarity, Then Be Unclear?

“We have made the Qur’an easy to understand and remember...” (Q 54:17)
“A clear Arabic Qur’an, without any crookedness...” (Q 39:28)

Yet:

• Many verses are ambiguous or "mutashabihat" (Q 3:7)

• Muslims disagree on basic doctrines: abrogation, jihad, women’s rights, divine attributes

• Hadiths are used to explain Qur’anic verses because the Qur’an often lacks context

Question:

How can a book that claims to be “clear” and “easy” require thousands of hadiths, commentaries, and legal schools to interpret it?

Either the Qur’an is clear and complete, or it is cryptic and in need of explanation.
It cannot be both.

---

❓5. Is the Qur’an Created or Uncreated? (The Ontological Contradiction)

Mainstream Sunni Islam says:

• The Qur’an is the uncreated speech of Allah, eternal and co-existent with God
  But also:

• The Qur’an was revealed in time, word by word, event by event

Question:

How can something be both eternal and yet revealed sequentially in time?

If the Qur’an is uncreated, how can it change with circumstances, contain abrogated verses, or respond to historical events?

This is not just metaphysical confusion—it is a logical contradiction.

---

❓6. Why Does the Qur’an Claim No Compulsion in Religion—Then Command War?

“Let there be no compulsion in religion...” (Q 2:256)
“To you your religion, and to me mine.” (Q 109:6)

But also:

• “Fight those who do not believe in Allah... until they pay the jizya...” (Q 9:29)

• “When the sacred months are over, kill the polytheists wherever you find them...” (Q 9:5)

Muslim scholars invoke abrogation (naskh) to cancel out peaceful verses.
So the peaceful ones are only temporary.

Question:

If “no compulsion” was abrogated, why include it at all?
If it was not abrogated, why do later verses command violence?

The Qur’an contradicts itself not just in theory—but in practice.

---

❓7. Why Claim the Qur’an Is Free from Human Input, Then Include Muhammad’s Justifications?

Examples:

• Muhammad is accused of taking his adopted son’s wife → suddenly a verse permits this (Q 33:37)

• He wants more wives → a verse grants this (Q 33:50)

• He swears not to touch a concubine → a verse releases him (Q 66:1)

These sound less like eternal decrees and more like divine justifications for personal desires.

Question:

Can a text that inserts the personal issues of its alleged recipient still be called “the eternal, uncreated word of God”?

The Qur’an becomes less of a universal revelation and more of a personal oracle.

---

❓8. Why Does the Qur’an Lack a Central Gospel Message?

Compare:

• The Bible has a clear, narrative arc: Creation → Fall → Covenant → Messiah → Death/Resurrection → New Creation

• The Qur’an lacks story structure, redemptive purpose, or central doctrine of salvation

Instead:

• The Qur’an is a fragmented, repetitive collection of warnings, laws, and condemnations

• No explanation of the Gospel that Jesus was sent with (despite claiming to affirm it)

Question:

If the Qur’an is the “final message,” why does it feel like a commentary, not a revelation?

The Qur’an presupposes the biblical worldview, contradicts it, and never offers a coherent alternative.

---

🧯 Conclusion: The Qur’an’s Early Contradictions Aren’t Peripheral — They Are Fatal

These are not “mysteries of faith.” They are logical violations, textual inconsistencies, and historical contradictions that Islam has never resolved.

Muslims saw the contradictions in Christianity.
They accused Jews of falsifying scripture.
But they refused to apply the same scrutiny to their own revelation.

Until they do, they will remain trapped in selective reasoning, defending a text that, by its own standards, is disqualified from being divine.